Ghana's 24-Hour Economy Secretariat has been sued multiple times over planned 24-hour markets, despite having no legal authority or oversight responsibility for these projects. Presidential Adviser on the 24-Hour Economy, Goosie Tanoh, confirmed the secretariat's lack of control over these market initiatives. This confusion has led to the secretariat being wrongly drawn into legal disputes.
Mr. Tanoh explained that public understanding often conflates the government's broader 24-hour economy agenda with the specific development of 24-hour markets. These markets are intended for establishment in 262 districts across Ghana. They fall under the direct purview of the Ministry of Local Government and district assemblies. Funding for these market projects is expected to come through the District Assemblies Common Fund.
This situation highlights a significant communication challenge within government initiatives. The distinction between a policy framework and specific infrastructure projects is crucial for public clarity and accountability. Ghana's economic development strategy often involves multiple agencies, requiring precise delineation of roles. The government's broader 24-hour economy programme aims to boost productivity and create jobs by expanding round-the-clock operations in key sectors. This initiative seeks to enhance Ghana's economic output and competitiveness on a national scale.
Mr. Tanoh stated, "Although they use a 24-hour logo, we have no control over the markets. We are not part of deciding where it goes, and so on and so forth." He further revealed that the secretariat has been sued four or five times regarding these market projects. "Our lawyer is moving a motion in November to get us to be removed from the defendant's list because we have no jurisdiction. We have no status in the matter," he added, underscoring the secretariat's lack of involvement.
The legal entanglements could divert resources and attention from the secretariat's core mandate. Decision-makers must clarify the roles of various government bodies to prevent future operational overlaps and legal challenges. Investors and the public will watch closely for clearer communication regarding government projects. This incident also raises questions about inter-agency coordination in implementing national development plans.
Despite the legal challenges, Mr. Tanoh acknowledged the potential benefits of the planned markets. He noted they could complement the government's wider economic objectives. Specifically, these markets could improve agricultural supply chains and significantly reduce post-harvest losses. He emphasized the critical need for storage and cooling facilities for perishable goods. Such infrastructure could help reduce losses estimated at between 30 and 40 percent across the agricultural supply chain. This reduction would directly benefit farmers and consumers, enhancing food security and economic efficiency.
The government's 24-hour economy programme seeks to expand production and services around the clock. Its stated aim is to boost productivity, create jobs, and strengthen overall economic activity. This broader vision includes strategic sectors beyond just market infrastructure. Effective implementation requires clear mandates and coordinated efforts across all relevant ministries and agencies. The current legal disputes underscore the importance of precise governance structures for large-scale national projects. Addressing these issues will be vital for the successful rollout of the 24-hour economy agenda.