Afenyo-Markin Alleges 'Grand Conspiracy' Against Former Chief Justice Torkornoo

    Minority Leader claims Chief Justice Baffoe-Bonnie orchestrated removal for personal ambition.

    2 min read4 min listen

    Minority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin has accused Chief Justice Paul Baffoe-Bonnie of orchestrating a “grand conspiracy” against former Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo. This accusation suggests a deliberate plot to remove Justice Torkornoo from her position. The alleged conspiracy aimed to clear the path for Justice Baffoe-Bonnie to assume the top judicial office.

    Justice Torkornoo was removed from office in September 2025 following proceedings under Article 146 of the 1992 Constitution. These proceedings stemmed from petitions alleging misconduct against her. A committee of inquiry, chaired by Supreme Court Justice Gabriel Scott Pwamang, conducted the investigation. Mr. Afenyo-Markin claims Justice Baffoe-Bonnie's ambition to become Chief Justice motivated this alleged plot. He stated, “My Lord Baffoe-Bonnie was part of the grand conspiracy against her predecessor, Gertrude Torkornoo.”

    This development fits into a broader narrative of political tension surrounding judicial appointments in Ghana. The removal of Justice Torkornoo and the subsequent appointment of Justice Baffoe-Bonnie have been contentious. The opposition New Patriotic Party (NPP) and the governing National Democratic Congress (NDC) hold differing views. The NPP has consistently accused the NDC government of undermining judicial independence. They argue the removal process was politically motivated. The government, however, defends the constitutional process that led to Justice Torkornoo's removal. This ongoing dispute highlights deep divisions over the integrity of Ghana's judicial system.

    Mr. Afenyo-Markin, the Effutu Member of Parliament, made these allegations while discussing the circumstances of Justice Torkornoo’s removal. He also spoke about Justice Baffoe-Bonnie’s subsequent appointment. He further alleged that some Supreme Court judges were involved in the events leading to Justice Torkornoo’s removal. “He knows, I know, the Supreme Court judges are—you know—who conspired against their colleague,” Mr. Afenyo-Markin stated. He insisted that the full story would eventually come to light. He spoke on Atinka TV, renewing his call for Justice Torkornoo’s reinstatement.

    The implications of these accusations are significant for Ghana's judiciary and political landscape. They raise questions about the independence and impartiality of the highest court. Continued allegations of political interference could erode public trust in judicial institutions. Decision-makers will need to address these concerns to maintain stability. The market might react to perceived instability, impacting investor confidence. The ongoing debate could influence future judicial appointments and reforms. Observers will watch closely for further revelations or official responses to these serious claims. The political ramifications, especially with upcoming elections, are substantial. The Minority Leader has consistently criticized the committee’s work, describing the process as a “travesty of justice.”

    During Justice Baffoe-Bonnie's vetting for the Chief Justice position in November 2025, Mr. Afenyo-Markin questioned the proceedings. He raised concerns about how multiple petitions against Justice Torkornoo were handled. He argued that procedural issues surrounding the inquiry require further scrutiny. The NPP has repeatedly accused the NDC government of undermining judicial independence. Justice Baffoe-Bonnie was approved by Parliament despite opposition from the Minority. This approval occurred even amidst these serious allegations. The call for Justice Torkornoo's reinstatement remains a major point of contention. This situation underscores the deep political divisions within Ghana's legal and governance structures. It also highlights the importance of transparency in high-level appointments. The integrity of the judicial system is paramount for a functioning democracy. Any perceived compromise could have long-lasting effects on the nation's governance. The public awaits further clarity on these grave allegations.

    Comments

    More from StatsGH