President Donald Trump has asked for changes to a proposed agreement with Iran. The goal is to end the fighting between the two nations, which started earlier this year. US media outlets reported these requests on June 1st, 2026.
The proposed edits specifically address the Strait of Hormuz, a vital shipping route. They also include plans for Iran to remove highly enriched uranium. These details were reported by CBS News, a US news partner of the BBC. The White House has not yet commented on these reports. Iran's chief negotiator, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, stated on Sunday that Tehran will not accept any deal unless its rights are fully protected.
This situation is connected to broader tensions in the Persian Gulf region. The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint for global oil shipments. Any disruption there can significantly impact oil prices and international trade. The ongoing debate over Iran's nuclear program also plays a key role in these discussions. Previously, a ceasefire went into effect on April 8th, but a formal agreement has not yet been reached.
US media reported that a meeting took place on Friday. President Trump and his senior aides discussed a framework for extending the ceasefire. The meeting concluded without clear decisions on the next steps. Axios first reported the latest iteration of the deal on Saturday. It includes a 60-day pause in violence. It also calls for reopening the Strait of Hormuz. A plan to restart negotiations on Iran's nuclear program is also part of the framework.
If diplomacy succeeds, the deal might include easing some sanctions on Iran. This could allow Iran to access billions of dollars in frozen assets. CBS reported these potential financial implications. These reports of further edits come after days of negotiations between Washington and Tehran. The aim is to end the months-long conflict. US officials announced on Thursday that a framework, known as a memorandum of understanding, was agreed upon. This was pending approval from President Trump and Iran's leadership.
President Trump stated on Thursday that his primary demand is the prevention of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons. He told his daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, in a Fox News interview that Iran has agreed to this. He also mentioned he is not in a hurry to finalize a deal. Following a meeting with aides on Friday, Trump signaled a willingness to accept the deal. A White House official stated that President Trump will only accept a deal beneficial to America and that meets his strict conditions. Iran must never possess nuclear weapons, the official added.
President Trump requested several amendments during the Friday meeting, according to Axios. It appears he has asked for further changes since then. US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, speaking from Singapore over the weekend, warned of potential renewed strikes. This would happen if a deal with Iran does not meet the president's expectations. He assured that US military stockpiles are adequate for such action.
Iranian officials have expressed skepticism regarding the White House's statements. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi commented that ongoing discussions are speculative until a clear conclusion is reached. State media reported his remarks. The Tasnim news agency stated that amendments are being proposed by both sides. Iran also indicated that the release of frozen assets is necessary before substantive nuclear talks can begin, according to Iranian media reports.
Pakistan has been acting as a mediator in these negotiations. Sunday's reports mark the third round of edits President Trump has made to the US proposal, CBS News indicated. Since the ceasefire began on April 8th, Trump has frequently suggested closeness to a deal. However, no formal agreement has been reached to date. The potential financial implications of sanctions relief could be significant for Iran's economy. Access to frozen assets could empower Iran's economic recovery and international financial activities.
The ongoing back-and-forth highlights the complexity of international diplomacy. Reaching a consensus requires mutual trust and adherence to agreed-upon terms. The involvement of a mediator like Pakistan suggests a mutual willingness to find common ground. The US focus on nuclear non-proliferation and regional stability remains a key concern for its foreign policy. The outcome of these negotiations will likely influence geopolitical dynamics in the Middle East and global energy markets.