The ECOWAS Court of Justice has adjourned its ruling on a critical legal challenge. Former Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo applied to the court to stop her removal from office. Ghana's government is opposing this application.
Justice Torkornoo asked the regional court for temporary measures. These measures would suspend the domestic process seeking her removal. She also wants to be reinstated with all her benefits. This request is pending the full case determination. The ECOWAS Court will announce its ruling date later.
During a hearing on July 14, 2025, Ghana raised objections. The Republic of Ghana argued that the ECOWAS Court has no power in this matter. This is because the case involves Ghana's internal constitutional processes. These processes are currently being handled by Ghanaian courts, including the Supreme Court. Ghana stated that the ECOWAS Court should not interfere.
The government warned that allowing the regional court to decide would be inappropriate. It could lead to conflicting court rulings. Ghana pointed to past ECOWAS Court decisions. These decisions show the court usually avoids cases already in national courts. Ghana insists the removal process followed all constitutional steps. The Chief Justice was properly informed. She received all necessary documents.
The former Chief Justice countered by stating her case is about human rights. She argued it does not require interpreting Ghana's constitution. Her application cites violations of regional human rights laws. These include rights to dignity, fair hearing, and work. Her legal team highlighted harm to her reputation. They also pointed to a potential damage to judicial independence. They warned that continuing the Ghanaian process could make the ECOWAS case pointless.
Justice Torkornoo's request for provisional measures is key. She argues these are needed to prevent lasting damage. This damage includes reputational harm and unfair treatment. She cited previous ECOWAS Court rulings. These rulings confirm its authority on human rights claims. This is especially true when national remedies are seen as ineffective.