Two Members of Parliament (MPs) are pushing back against proposed changes to the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill. They argue that new exemptions will weaken the bill. John Ntim Fordjour, an MP, stated the bill is now a 'watered-down version'. He believes these changes dilute the original intent.
The debate centres on clauses that would protect certain professionals. These include journalists reporting on LGBTQ issues. Medical professionals, counsellors, and lawyers providing services to LGBTQ individuals are also part of the discussion. MP Nana Asafo-Adjei Ayeh criticised these proposals. He stated they significantly change the bill presented earlier.
The original bill, sponsored in the Eighth Parliament, did not include these protections. Mr. Ayeh believes exemptions for NGOs, academic publications, and scientific opinions create loopholes. He feels this undermines the aim of prohibiting LGBTQ activities and advocacy.
Rev. Ntim Fordjour echoed these concerns. He specifically mentioned medical, psychological, and counselling services. He argued that these were not part of the initial legislation sponsored in the Eighth Parliament. He also opposed exemptions for media reporting and public health initiatives. He warned that these could indirectly support LGBTQ activities.
The sponsors of the bill will resist these exceptions. Mr. Ntim Fordjour declared, 'We will resist it.' He finds any attempt to add these exceptions highly problematic.
However, Majority Leader Mahama Ayariga defended the proposed changes. He explained the exemptions are meant to define boundaries narrowly. They aim to prevent legitimate professional duties from being criminalised. Mr. Ayariga stated the bill is not being diluted. It is being clarified to avoid constitutional and legal challenges.
He believes courts would not tolerate punishing lawyers defending LGBTQ individuals. He also argued courts would likely dismiss charges against journalists for reporting on LGBTQ matters. Mr. Ayariga maintained that the bill's main goals remain clear. The bill still prohibits both the practice and advocacy of LGBTQ activities in Ghana. This ongoing debate highlights the complex legal and ethical considerations surrounding the proposed legislation.