A 38-year-old social media user, Michael Owusu, faces criminal charges for creating a video alleging a dangerous discovery. He is accused of publishing false news with the intent to disturb public peace. The TikTok post claimed he found a razor blade inside a sachet of Special Ice mineral water. This incident has led to his arrest and arraignment before the Accra Circuit Court 10.
The core of the charge revolves around Owusu's claim that a sachet of Special Ice water he purchased contained a razor blade. He allegedly posted a video on TikTok describing his supposed discovery and warning the public to be careful. The prosecution states this claim is untrue and was made with knowledge of its falsity, aiming to cause public alarm. The case falls under Section 208(1) of the Criminal Offences Act, 1960 (Act 29), and Section 123 of the Electronic Transactions Act, 2008 (Act 772).
This case touches on the broader economic theme of consumer confidence and the impact of unchecked digital dissemination of information. In Ghana, the food and beverage industry, particularly packaged water producers, operate under strict regulatory oversight. False claims can significantly damage brand reputation, leading to potential market share loss and economic repercussions for the manufacturing company. The legal action underscores the government's stance against the spread of misinformation that can destabilize businesses and public order.
During the court proceedings on May 18, 2026, the defense counsel, Lawyer Raymond Quaye, cross-examined the first prosecution witness. This witness was Mr. Edem Kugbe, the Sales and Marketing Manager for Special Ice Mineral Water and the complainant. The cross-examination explored the water production process, acknowledging the possibility of human error during manufacturing. The second prosecution witness is expected to testify on June 22, 2026. Lawyer Quaye expressed confidence in his client's case, suggesting the prosecution may struggle to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
The implications of this case extend to how social media content is regulated and its impact on established businesses. Consumers and businesses alike will watch for the court's decision. It will set a precedent for handling similar digital claims that affect public perception and business operations. The outcome could influence how social media platforms are monitored and how content creators are held accountable for their posts. The court adjourned the hearing to June 22, 2026.